Delivering True Transformation
Business transformation has been a requisite conversation point for C-Suite professionals for decades. But evidence indicates a wide gap between talking points and actual achievement. According to a Boston Consulting Group (BCG) study, only 26% of corporate transformations were successful in creating both short-term and long-term value.1
How is transformation achieved?
Successful businesses have always needed to change and evolve to remain competitive. Beginning in the 1990s, however, companies, particularly financial services firms, were squeezed by multiple pressures that radically changed business practices and tools to manage them:
- •Globalization, which meant no big business was local anymore
- •Technological modernization, which enabled operational processes to keep up with new regulations
- •Ongoing advancements in industry-related systems further accelerated changes in a rapidly evolving business landscape dotted with mergers, acquisitions, startups, and failures
Many early transformation efforts were scrambles to adapt to the new business environment or to absorb operational demands. Here, many businesses approached their “transformations” as improvements needed for just one segment of their business, not the overall enterprise. A focus on operations, for example, was often perceived as a quality control or productivity exercise rather than something that affected the core of the business.
Most businesses mishandle transformation
According to Bain & Company research, over one-third of large companies have a transformation project currently underway.2 A McKinsey report on business transformation noted, “success remains the exception not the rule.”3 A recent article in the Harvard Business Review (HBR) echoed, “Unfortunately, most transformation programs aren’t all that transformative.”4
Missing the Mark
The results from two surveys, in 2013 and again in 2023, of 300 large companies by Bain & Company reinforce the sentiments that global transformation initiatives are missing the mark. From one decade to the next, only 12% of companies said their programs “met or exceeded expectations.” In 2013, one in every two companies said they “settled for mediocre results” — defined as achieving more than 50% of their targets but less than 100% — while three-quarters of companies gave that assessment in 2023.4
What’s making companies stumble so badly?
Reasons point back to a basic failure to understand what transformation is and, therefore, how to take advantage of its possibilities. Both McKinsey and HBR cite the need for companies to bring a big picture view of their organization to the table, and to factor in well-thought-out vision and mission perspectives over a checklist approach that simply improves short-term business-as-usual results.
BCG underscores the importance of a long-term strategic orientation: “Beyond mindset, culture, and metrics, a long-term orientation also means investing in the exploration of new ideas that could be the basis of future advantage,” and also suggests factoring in the sad reality that “when it comes to transformations, no one is special.”5
The odds of achieving all aspects of an ambitious change are low, and have been persistently low over time, despite lessons learned. That’s why approaching a transformation with an entrepreneurial outlook, in which you are open to new ideas that are anchored to your fundamental long-term vision, will allow you to think strategically and not tactically, and result in greater success.
FREE YOUR TEAMS: The Pitfalls of Over Relying on Ops Developers
Apply lessons learned to technological transformation
A technological transformation may be transformative in itself or it may be part of a larger business transformation. In either case, lessons learned from business transformations also apply:
- •Lead with a comprehensive future-focused mission
- •Consider the process a series of mini-transformations that may even continue beyond the program, rather than a single flip of the switch
- •Be open to new ideas throughout
- •Learn from the mistakes of your competitors
- •Position for tomorrow’s opportunities, not just today’s crises
For some financial companies, technological transformation is no longer optional because operational issues are swamping resources. Others have realized their solution to poor performance and/or cost overruns lies in a data and systems overhaul. Many firms still have datasets locked up in legacy platforms or other function-specific silos. On the flip side, many aspire for AI to be a game-changer for their organizations.
Wavestone’s latest Data and AI Leadership Executive Survey, primarily CDOs and CDAOs, found that investments in data and analytics were a top priority for 87.9% of firms, while 62.3% also cited investments in GenAI as a top priority.7
RELATED READING: Demystifying the Path to a Modern Data Platform
Modern data architecture is foundational
Whatever their particular goals, firms should stay focused on achieving a target state of unified data architecture, instead of chasing the technology of the day or the latest trend. Not only do siloed structures fiercely limit scalability, but they also trap enterprise value. A centralized data and tooling system addresses, among other downsides, the high cost of ownership, poor governance, and unreliable data quality issues of disparate or redundant stacks. The right architecture allows you to run your business in a more optimized, streamlined way.
As studies have shown, the key to many business or technology transformation projects is organized, clean data. From more efficient, effective reporting to integrating middle- and back-office functions to generating trustworthy modelling, achieving the results expected from an investment in transformation begins with data quality.
For example, data quality is central to AI. Predictive models that rely on low-quality data will result in equally poor-quality predictions and recommendations. Companies reliant on modeling to make strategic decisions on products and services are taking a risk to leapfrog to AI without addressing their significant data issues. Even the more fundamental task of digitizing what was previously manual data entry requires understanding where that data comes from, how it’s used, how it’s verified, and who needs access to it for analysis and reporting, among other uses.
Put another way, a single unified platform with robust specialized capabilities allows financial companies to move their data strategy forward, building in resiliency and allowing for ongoing transformation.
To learn more about key factors your organization should consider as you navigate transformation, read our best practice guide on Determining a Migration Path to Modern Technology Platforms.
Sources:
1. Five Truths and a Lie About Corporate Transformation, Boston Consulting Group. April 12, 2024.
2. Business Transformations that Work, Bain and Company
3. Losing from day one: Why even successful transformations fall short, McKinsey & Company, December 7, 2021
4. Transformations that Work, Harvard Business Review, May-June 2024
5. Five Truths and a Lie About Corporate Transformation, Boston Consulting Group, April 12, 2024
6. 2024 Data and AI Leadership Executive Survey, Wavestone, January 9, 2024
Share This Post
Subscribe Today
No spam. Just the latest releases and tips, interesting articles, and exclusive interviews in your inbox every week.
